Catholic doctrinal error propagates child abuse scandals!

During the recently completed Easter/Passover season there were a great number of headlines in the various media sources I was following about the latest episode of the Roman Catholic Church and the illicit appetites of its clergy for pedophilia. This time around the scandal of Catholic priests sexually abusing children was stunning Europe.  The media has been talking about incidents in Ireland and Germany where, it seems, some are questioning whether the current pope was actually involved himself in covering up some abuse cases that happened there, during the time he was in charge .

A few years ago the scandal of Roman Catholic priests having sex with children (both boys and girls) in their care was outraging the United States. To settle some of those resulting law suits the American Catholic Church paid out hundreds of millions of dollars just in compensation not to mention their legal bills. Canada also has its own memory of the repeated, widespread abuse of Canadian Catholic children, including aboriginals, by Catholic clergy and other members of Catholic religious orders.

People are disgusted, of course, with the actual wolves in sheep’s clothing who committed those acts that have profoundly hurt and even destroyed so many thousands of innocent lives. Their odious predator names will burn in infamy just as long as their deeds continue to haunt the consciences of those they personally abused as well as their victim’s families!

But most thinking people are also angry with the Roman Catholic hierarchy who habitually protected their pedophile priests while turning a deaf ear to the victims for far too long. People are also angry with Pope Benedict for being unwilling to speak or even issue the appropriate profound apologies for an organization that has caused so much suffering. And actually, today, the Associated Press posted this news story written by Gillian Flaccus:

The future Pope Benedict XVI resisted pleas to defrock a California priest with a record of sexually molesting children, citing concerns including “the good of the universal church,” according to a 1985 letter bearing his signature. The correspondence, obtained by The Associated Press, is the strongest challenge yet to the Vatican’s insistence that Benedict played no role in blocking the removal of pedophile priests during his years as head of the Catholic Church’s doctrinal watchdog office.

When you consider this problem, these angry people are right to insist on an apology. Why? Because the root of this systemic evil of sexual perverseness by Catholic priests does indeed lie with the pope!

How so? Well, the pope and his predecessors—who loudly pretend that they are the direct lineal successors of the Apostle Peter—are directly responsible for refusing to allow their male clergy to follow the Apostle Peter’s own personal example! After all, the Scriptures plainly say that the Apostle Peter was married:

14When Jesus came into Peter’s house, he saw Peter’s mother-in-law lying in bed with a fever. 15He touched her hand and the fever left her, and she got up and began to wait on him. (Matthew 8:14-15 New International Version).

Also, consider this statement by the Apostle Paul in defense of his rights to financial support when traveling as a minister of the Gospel:

5Do we not have the right to be accompanied by a believing wife, as do the other apostles and brothers of the Lord and Cephas [Peter]? (1 Corinthians 9:5 New Revised Standard Version).

Next, look at what the Apostle Paul writes about the qualifications for bishops [Gk: episkopos: also elder or minister]

2Now a bishop must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, temperate, sensible, respectable, hospitable, and apt teach, not a drunkard, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, and not a lover of money. 4He must manage his own household well, keeping his children submissive and respectful in every way—for if someone does not know how to manage his own household, how can he take care of God’s church (1 Timothy 3:2-5 NRSV).

The problem with the Roman Catholic Church is that they have trusted in their human traditions that engender twisted sexual perversions among their clergy instead of relying on the purifying effect that comes from following the Scriptures first and foremost when setting doctrine and moral standards.

The Creator made man with a strong sex drive as a motivation to cause him to marry a woman and engender children. Through these intimate familial relationships a godly man could learn priceless lessons that could enable him to effectively serve in the Church, the household of the Living God. To deprive the man of this Scripturally approved outlet for his God-given sex drive is like giving a free pass to Satan to pervert the man into a pedophile. The evil fruits of unscriptural doctrine should be evident to all.

3 thoughts on “Catholic doctrinal error propagates child abuse scandals!

  1. Pingback: The World Tomorrow » Catholic doctrinal error propagates child … - Christian IBD

  2. JF

    Hi Jeff

    Since your topic deals with Catholic doctrinal error, I thought it would be worthwhile to check with a Catholic translation … to see if these clear points exist in “their Bible”. Here are the 3 scriptures in the New Jerusalem Bible:

    14 And going into Peter’s house Jesus found Peter’s mother-in-law in bed and feverish.

    5 And every right to be accompanied by a Christian wife, like the other apostles, like the brothers of the Lord, and like Cephas?

    2 That is why the presiding elder must have an impeccable character. Husband of one wife, he must be temperate, discreet and courteous, hospitable and a good teacher;

    Since these “clear scriptures” ARE clear (even in a “Catholic certified” translation), I can see why the New Catholic Encyclopedia grants this point by saying:

    “Although we do not find in the New Testament any indication of celibacy being made compulsory either upon the Apostles or those whom they ordained…”
    (http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03481a.htm)

    The article goes on to explain or “defend” why the Catholic Church DOES require celebacy of it’s priests.

    Jeff … your scripture choices clearly establish the biblical & New Testament example of a “married clergy” … I am hoping you can take this one step further by making some comments on the “scriptures & reasoning” used in the New Catholic Encyclopedia article on “Celebacy”. This would provide some further support for the case you are making, and hopefully provide some pointers on how to analyse a “doctrinal defense” (to something you are establishing from the title of your article as “doctrinal error”).

  3. Charity

    Hi, I just wanted to say that celibacy doesn’t lead to pedophilia. There’s no evidence of that at all. Why would a pedophile even want to get married to an adult woman? Pedophiles sexually attack children and many end up killing their victims.
    If a priest was having sexual temptations and he’s not a pedophile, then he would surely go after a grown woman, not a child. Pedophiles aren’t just some poor ol’ horny souls who haven’t had sex in so long that they just start chasing after whatever comes their way. Pedophiles prefer children and that’s all that they want. Heaven forbid a person with this sickness should ever get married in the first place.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *